All
I'm hoping to see some discussion on the mailing list on this, or we'll
bring it up in Prague.
This draft has been languishing that was resolved with some discussion,
and it's time to either move it along or shut it down.
tim
On 7/3/15 10:26 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
This update to the draft adds the support of two additional authors,
simplifies it somewhat and also including a connection-close signal.
A further change is the removal of the usage of the option over UDP
since the semantics of whether a UDP message can say anything about a
subsequent TCP message are unclear.
The authors request working group discussion on this point.
Ray
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
