On 06Jul15, internet-dra...@ietf.org allegedly wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group > of the IETF. > > Title : Client Subnet in DNS Queries > Authors : Carlo Contavalli > Wilmer van der Gaast > David C Lawrence > Warren Kumari > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-02.txt > Pages : 27 > Date : 2015-07-06
I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that there was a plan to rewrite this spec in light of actually implementation experiences. Is this draft that rewrite? I ask as this seems to be more a clean-up of the original draft. If it is the former then one issue I raised with the previous draft remains undiscussed and unchanged. That being the notion of caches/resolvers using white lists to constrain which servers should be sent the ECS option. We all know a white-list doesn't scale for an internet protocol and my limited experience of hunting down owners, exchanging emails and agreeing on a white list format is pretty broken and brittle. I would think that if we're to proceed with this protocol then the white list requirement should be removed from the spec. Mark. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
