On 30/07/2015 17:50, Paul Vixie wrote:
> why so? i argued for hop-by-hop in EDNS for reasons which still appear > "good" to me. just as with additional-data section processing (which is > per-Qtype), this kind of data forwarding should be part of each option's > specification. Mostly because IMHO it would be a darned sight simpler (and more future proof) not to have to look up from a per-value table whether any particular option should be forwarded or dropped. I'm thinking in particular of things with embedded firmware that don't routinely get updates. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
