On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote:
> On Monday, October 19, 2015 11:32:27 Tony Finch wrote: > > Mukund Sivaraman <m...@isc.org> wrote: > > > > > > ISC is implementing a zone catalog synchronization method in BIND. This > > > is the first public draft of various ideas and suggestions that were > > > pooled together and is named "DNS catalog zones". > > > > Yay! Why not call the feature "metazones" since that's the term we are > > familiar with? > > there's been enough churn at isc in recent years that probably noone now > working there remembers metazones. > > muks, et al, see: <http://family.redbarn.org/~vixie/mz.pdf>. > > > I recently hacked together a crappy version, which is deliberately dumb > > and BIND-specific. http://dotat.at/prog/nsnotifyd/ > > > > I didn't implement Vixie-format metazones mainly out of laziness. ... > > it's terribly simple. laziness can't be an excuse, it just wasn't that > difficult! see: <http://family.redbarn.org/~vixie/mz.tgz>. > > -- > Paul > > After reading both formats, I prefer http://family.redbarn.org/~vixie/mz.tgz - ordered lists are multiple records and can be as large a list as needed. No new record types needed. If I had seen this before, I probably would have implemented it by now. It has been on my wish list for a while. -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
