On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:33:49PM -0400, Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote a message of 59 lines which said:
> This revision incorporated editorial improvements and improvements in > explanatory and motivational text based on comments on the WG mailing > list. I've read it and diffed it and I believe it is OK. Section 5.2 is now, IMO, much clearer and it addresses the problem reported in <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/QrrLtnCXhVI8usZsvAd5PU_b1Y4>, thanks. Editorial: "correct souce addresses" -> "correct source addresses", "improves the probablity" -> "improves the probability". Also, "a client MUST send client COOKIEs" is not a consistent casing of cookie. It should be Client Cookies, to follow the convention of the rest of the draft. Same thing for "a server MUST send server COOKIEs". _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
