On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 03:50:54PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Should the second condition on the RR type have an explicit "besides > NSEC3" qualifier? Or am I missing something that implicitly excludes RR > type NSEC3? Otherwise it seems to me that the second condition is always > false.
Yes, it should have that qualifier. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
