On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:01:21PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > Added to that, the "A" record type is also found in some places with RR > TYPE=1, with the same name "A" for the CH class, where it has a > completely different RDATA format and meaning. It isn't listed on the > DNS parameters page, but it is implemented so by BIND and you can find a > description here: > > http://victor.se/bjorn/its/chaos-dns.php
Wow. Well, that's helpful to know, so thanks. The fact that people in the world are defining RRTYPEs in a class-dependent way without putting anything in the registry is kinda awful, though. Certainly another way in which classes appear to be loaded and aimed at feet. Thanks for the reference! A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop