On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:01:21PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> Added to that, the "A" record type is also found in some places with RR
> TYPE=1, with the same name "A" for the CH class, where it has a
> completely different RDATA format and meaning. It isn't listed on the
> DNS parameters page, but it is implemented so by BIND and you can find a
> description here:
> 
> http://victor.se/bjorn/its/chaos-dns.php

Wow.  Well, that's helpful to know, so thanks.  The fact that people
in the world are defining RRTYPEs in a class-dependent way without
putting anything in the registry is kinda awful, though.  Certainly
another way in which classes appear to be loaded and aimed at feet.
Thanks for the reference!

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
a...@anvilwalrusden.com

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to