Stephane, At 2016-04-06 13:37:15 -0300 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
> This draft is a result of a proposal I made in Yokohama > <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-dnsop-8.pdf> > where it seems it received some interest. > > I do not ask to discuss it during our DNSOP meetings (I sent it too > late for that and there are still too many TODOs). But it is part of > the RFC 6761 discussion that we all love spending our time with :-) Hm, interesting. One minor possible concern is with .ONION, where I assume that the Tor operators would prefer as little leakage as possible. It seems that a DNAME to EMPTY.AS112.ARPA which goes to an unmanaged anycast network might be an increase in leakage. (It may also be that if EMPTY.AS112.ARPA is already cached that it would be a decrease in leakage, since no additional query would go to the AS112 servers?) I admit that even in the worst case it is probably not a LOT more leakage, but I think that it is some? Or am I misunderstanding? Cheers, -- Shane
pgpCoS54zX4um.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
