Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Shouldn't/can't section 3.1.13. (UDP size limits) also specify a real test? 2) To follow up with the tsv-art review: To avoid network as well as server overload, would it be useful to provide further guidance, when and how often these tests should be performed? 3) In section 6.1. (What To Do): maybe also list logging as an option in cases where no user is directly involved but a human might check later. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
