Tim, At 2016-07-22 21:39:41 -0400 Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know we've just started talking about this, and the authors are still > sorting out a few things, but the sense of the room we received was to > adopt it, work on it, etc. > > It appears they have simplified it in the -01 version. > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > With this being the summer, we're going to run a 3 week call for adoption. > > This call for adoption ends: Thursday, 12 August 2016 I think the document itself needs some work (such as more detailed motivation statement, some use cases, probably getting rid of "terminate session", and so on). At first I thought that this should stay in homenet, but it does use a lot of DNS jargon which probably makes it best to sit in dnsop, so I support its adoption. Cheers, -- Shane
pgpMRmUDBM2Bd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
