At Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:01:52 +0300, Andreas Gustafsson <g...@araneus.fi> wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with existing resolvers that use the same > timeout and retransmission strategies for priming queries as for any > other query, and it seems wrong to me that a specific retransmission > timeout should be required for some queries but not others. +1. This is actually I thought in my own read of the draft. Mentioning a specific timeout value seems a clear overkilling (with no apparent reason) to me, and while I wouldn't be necessarily opposed to mentioning the retry at all, it's still awkward to me. So I'd be happier if it's simply removed. -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
