On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:57:05AM -0700, internet-dra...@ietf.org <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote a message of 48 lines which said:
> Title : The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain > Authors : Warren Kumari > Andrew Sullivan > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05.txt The previous versions were, and I think it was good, carefully non-normative. .ALT was presented (as it should) as a MAY, not a MUST or a SHOULD. Now, sentences like "This document provides a solution that may, in many cases, be more appropriate than [RFC6761]." are, IMHO, too much. I suggest "This document provides, in some cases, an alternative solution to [RFC6761]" Also, disparaging terms like "pseudo-TLD" should be avoided. "Non-DNS TLD" is sufficient. > This label is intended to be used as the final (rightmost) label No. It is rightmost only in LTR scripts. "final" is correct, "rightmost" isn't. Please delete it. > For example, a group wishing to create a namespace for Friends Of > Olaf might choose the string "foo" If this namespace uses a non-DNS protocol for resolution, it may be case-sensitive and therefore it should be "FoO". (Yes, this was a troll.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
