I will be happy to do that, stay tuned as I need to create a special signer for it :-)
Olafur On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016, Ólafur Guðmundsson wrote: > > I have domains signed by all combinations of signing algorithms and DS >> digests as well as Nsec variants >> Ds-n.alg-m-nsec.dnssec-test.org >> >> Replace n with 1..4 >> M with 1..14 >> Nsec is one of Nsec nsec3 none >> > > I'd be veryinterested if you could create an algorithm called "99" (or > something), and we could test that. Anyone not loading the "99" resource is > violating the "SHOULD", even if they understand ECDSA. > > This would investigate ratio of problems when we want to introduce a new > algorithm in the future. > > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
