On 10/14/2016 05:09 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:04:21AM -0400,
> Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote
> a message of 19 lines which said:
>
>> But by adding delegations in the root to AS112, aren't we making it
>> more likely that the queries leak further onto the net?
>
> That's precisely the point described in section 6, second paragraph.
For .local, I can see the point of sinking it as locally as possible.
But it does not make sense for all DNS software and all resolver admins
to try to keep track of all the zones that need to be sinked.
I don't remember if Teredo address space (0.0.0.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa.) was
in the proposal, but it's a good example anyhow, isn't it?
--
+358 44 9756548 / http://www.trex.fi/
Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy
You say "potato", I say "closest-exit."
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
