Sigh, I did. Thank you Matthijs for keeping me honest.
tim On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Matthijs Mekking <matth...@pletterpet.nl> wrote: > Tim, > > On 13-12-16 20:13, tjw ietf wrote: > >> All >> >> The process of WGLC for this document engaged the working group and >> there was much discussion and several different versions. It seems that >> the authors have addressed everything that has been brought up. >> >> We felt another formal Working Group Last call was needed, though >> hopefully shorter. >> >> This starts a Working Group Last Call for: >> "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3" >> draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse >> >> Current versions of the draft is available here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/> >> >> For those looking for the differences, these are the differences between >> the document submitted, and the current one: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggr >> essiveuse-02&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-03 >> > > > I think you meant: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggr > essiveuse-02&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-07 > > Best regards, > Matthijs > > > >> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone >> feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with >> your reasons. >> >> >> This starts a *one* week Working Group Last Call process, and ends at >> midnight 20 December 2016 UTC. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >> > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
