I am strongly opposed to unsecured delegations in the root zone. No matter what the problem is, an unsecured delegation is not the answer.
Steve > On Dec 14, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > DNSOP participants who are interested in the special use names problem might > want to review draft-ietf-homenet-redact > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-redact/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-redact/>) and > draft-ietf-homenet-dot > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-dot/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-dot/>) for the WGLC on > them in the HOMENET wg. > > WGLC comments should go to the WG list, home...@ietf.org > <mailto:home...@ietf.org>. > > If you do, it will also be helpful to look at RFC 7788, which specifies the > Home Networking Control Protocol for homenets. > > The redact draft is intended to remove the inadvertent reservation of “.home” > as the default namespace for homenets in RFC 7788. > > The homenet-dot draft is intended to provide a request under RFC 6761 for > “.homenet” as a special use name to serve as a default namespace for > homenets. It also asks IANA for an unsecured delegation in the root zone to > avoid DNSSEC validation failures for local names under “.homenet”. The root > zone request to IANA has caused some discussion within the WG, as there’s no > precedent for such a request. > > Terry Manderson mentioned the homenet-dot draft briefly at the mic in Seoul. > > The WGLC ends this week. > > > Suzanne > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk <mailto:r...@bellis.me.uk>> >> Subject: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot" >> Date: November 17, 2016 at 11:27:08 PM EST >> To: HOMENET <home...@ietf.org <mailto:home...@ietf.org>> >> >> This email commences a four week WGLC comment period on >> draft-ietf-homenet-redact and draft-ietf-homenet-dot >> >> Please send any comments to the WG list as soon as possible. >> >> Whilst there was a very strong hum in favour of ".homenet" vs anything >> else during the meeting, and there's some discussion of that ongoing >> here on the list - I'd like us to please keep the discussion of the >> choice of domain separate from other substantive comment about the >> drafts' contents. >> >> thanks, >> >> Ray >> >> _______________________________________________ >> homenet mailing list >> home...@ietf.org <mailto:home...@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
