I see that IESG has approved this document, but I am still wondering this:
On 01-12-16 13:20, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
Hi, I read this again. I still wonder if in the case of DNSSEC Delete Algorithm it wouldn't be easier to say: In case the DNSSEC algorithm is 0, the Digest/Public Key MUST be ignored. This way, you don't have to change the CDS/CDNSKEY format defined in RFC 7344, most likely causing less problems with deployed software.
Best regards, Matthijs _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
