The working group has consensus to give it a try. We may change our minds of it takes too long, but it seems worth exploring from a process perspective anyway.
On Feb 5, 2017 11:18 PM, "John R Levine" <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > I'm pretty sure I've explained it enough times on this mailing list and in >> the relevant documents by now. If you don't agree, maybe we should just >> accept that. If you don't remember the explanation, it's in the homenet >> naming architecture doc I wrote. >> > > Well, OK, I took another look, and from what I can see, it's a belief that > people will find toaster.homenet.arpa harder or more confusing to type than > toaster.homenet. > > Just out of curiosity, how long is it worth waiting to get .homenet rather > than .homenet.arpa? If it took five more years, which at the current rate > seems optimistic, would homenet still be relevant? > > R's, > John >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
