Shhh. don't confuse with facts. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Frederico A C Neves <fne...@registro.br> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 01:15:42PM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote: > ... > > > > Apparently there are many folks in the community who think so, otherwise > > NSEC3 would not have been developed. I personally don't care for any > zones > > I know others have already stated this but zone enumeration, at least > at that time, was never the real reason for NSEC3, size of signing > zones with mostly unsigned delegations was. This was only needed > because of the wg lack of management and sensibility to operators > needs leading to the historical debacle of opt-in. We changed the > name, and voila opt-out ;-) > > Fred > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
