On Tue, September 5, 2017 09:04, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 06:09:06AM +0200, > Walter H. <walte...@mathemainzel.info> wrote > a message of 20 lines which said: > >> I see it exact this, and it would be fair to prevent future bugs with >> defining one or two FAKE TLDs (e.g. .corp, .lan) for exact this use >> case; > > Why does it need to be a TLD (see all the discussions here about > Special Use Domain Names, .alt, .alt.arpa, etc)?
.alt is a TLD ... > Why not lan.mycompany.com? because mycompany.com is in WHOIS ..., see below >> - there isn't really a uniqness as requirement > > As I said before, and explained, you're wrong here, no, because nobody said, that uniqness is forbidden ..., and uniqness implicitly requires the other point which I'd say, that MUST NOT >> - a public WHOIS grabbing for these domains needn't also be given; > > With a subdomain of your Second Level Domain, no need for WHOIS (or > RDAP). you are wrong ... the subdomain is part of the Second Level Domain and so there is a need for WHOIS (or RDAP) for the Second Level Domain ... _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
