On Oct 31, 2017, at 07:27, Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> wrote: >> On 30/10/2017 17:40, Evan Hunt wrote: >> >> IIRC we discussed it, and were concerned that _ta. could be cached as >> nonexistent by servers implementing QNAME minimization. > > How would that happen, at least so long as _ta responds like any other > empty non-terminal?
Perhaps I missed something, but how do you ensure that _ta is an empty non-terminal? Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop