On Oct 31, 2017, at 07:27, Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> wrote:

>> On 30/10/2017 17:40, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> 
>> IIRC we discussed it, and were concerned that _ta. could be cached as
>> nonexistent by servers implementing QNAME minimization.
> 
> How would that happen, at least so long as _ta responds like any other
> empty non-terminal?

Perhaps I missed something, but how do you ensure that _ta is an empty 
non-terminal?


Joe
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to