On 18.12.2017 20:05, Paul Vixie wrote: > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> As I mentioned in this errata >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4983>, I think RFC 2308 was >> wrong in redefining QNAME. My personal preference would be to change >> the second paragraph to "RFC 2308 proposed another definition, >> different from the original one. Since it is actually a different >> concept, it would be better to find another name for it. Here, QNAME >> retains the original definition of RFC 1034." > > +1.
+1, yes please. -- Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
