On 6.2.2018 13:22, Tony Finch wrote: > A. Schulze <s...@andreasschulze.de> wrote: >> >> Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN" is more descriptive and specific. >> I also prefer that longer variant. > > Yes, more friendly for web searches if someone is wondering about weird > queries.
Bonus points if we can get a number reserved by RFC editor, it would allow us to use name like test-rfc0000-is-ta-NNNN test-rfc0000-not-ta-NNNN That would be super awesome. Is something like RFC number pre-allocation possible? -- Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
