On 12 Mar 2018, at 11:58, Roland Bracewell Shoemaker <rol...@letsencrypt.org> wrote:
> After a number of discussions I’m interested in returning to the original > concept as it simplifies a number of use cases that this document is intended > to support but am still not sure whether or not this would be widely > considered ‘ok’ by DNS folks. Obviously it’s entirely possible to do this as > these child zones are delegated to users and they _can_ put whatever they > want in them. Does this WG have strong opinions on whether we > should/shouldn’t do this for technical reasons or we just being a bit too > strict in our reading of 3172? I think that if Tony can be d...@dotat.at, surely I can be jab...@90.212.199.in-addr.arpa. A zone is a zone. ARPA is only special by convention, not by protocol. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
