Hi all, While the chair notes awareness of the point I raised, I’d like the be explicit to avoid any confusion.
This document is *not* ready for publication. There is no implementation report available for review and consideration. Should the working group produce an implementation report and demonstrate multiple implementations before April 15th, I’d ofcourse be willing to reconsider my position. Kind regards, Job On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 18:36, tjw ietf <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > After walking through the 168 emails on this draft in the inbox, I feel > we're ready to take this to WGLC. > > (We are aware of the two points raised my Job and Paul) > > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for: > draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel/ > > The Current Intended Status of this document is: Proposed Standard > > In the brushing of the camel, the draft is focused on determining if > a particular root key has been loaded into resolvers. > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. > If this does not seem appropriate please speak out. > if someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak > out with your reasons. > > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: > 23:59 19 April 2018 > > thanks > tim > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
