At Thu, 5 Apr 2018 13:46:29 -0400, tjw ietf <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is work: An "informational" document being used as standard is people > taking a submitted (expired) draft as "standard"? I'm not sure how to interpret it (not even sure if it's a question to me)...but I guess what I think is the most important point of my previous message is "for future dnsop documents, we shouldn't use the intended informational status as an excuse to casually dismiss serious questions/suggestions from implementers". -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
