On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote: > > > On 2 April 2018 at 09:56, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: >> >> >> This is not clearly a modification to the intended consensus (yet), >> and currently feels unclear to me, so I'm going to give this another >> few days (~1 week) and then, probably, mark it Hold for Document >> Update. I'd still appreciate peoples' views and comments on if this is >> correct.
One week is up, and I posted it as Hold for Document Update. Thanks everyone for your review and advice. W >> > Hold for Document Update seems like the right choice to me. I don't think > it's proper Errata for the reasons already mentioned, and as we're already > discussing maybe obsoleting 1035 with a rewrite, Hold seems more prudent > than Reject. > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
