On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 07:42:36PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > But that requires a new "XNAME" rrtype, whereas what the users want > is a more flexible CNAME that coëxists with other RRtypes.
Ah. I didn't understand that you were proposing to reuse the CNAME rrtype for this. I think it would be impossible to make that work sanely with legacy resolvers. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
