On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 7:13 AM Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com> wrote: > [..] The portion of the community that > would benefit from actually using the new deployment models described > in the document is likely much smaller: a set of enterprises that > need to deploy DNSSEC in a multiple signing provider configuration, > and a set of managed DNS providers that are willing and capable of > supporting this. I expect this population will grow over time if/when > DNSSEC adoption grows. And yes, this does solve a real problem for > those enterprises.
Reflects my experience entirely. Would be happy to see this adopted by the WG. | Artyom Gavrichenkov | gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191 | mailto: xima...@gmail.com | fb: ximaera | telegram: xima_era | skype: xima_era | tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
