On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:50 PM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> On 7/25/2018 2:32 AM, Mats Dufberg wrote: > > _ta-XXXX should go into table 2 on page 9 of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf. > > > Wow. This is a unique case, since it reserves essentially all of an > even-more-subordinate namespace -- everything to the right of that dash. > > Theoretically it isn't that inclusive but in practical terms, unless we > want complex pattern-matching for sub-strings at run-time, it is. > > I'm inclined to have the notation be: > > _ta-.* > > to draw from regex, with an explicit reference to that, unless folks > agree on something else. (Yes, that's 'pattern matching' but it's in > the specification document, not the operational code.) > > Thoughts? > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > Dot "." has special meaning in DNS, so I would prefer: _ta-* Not regex, but a common wildcard usage. -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
