Hi Mirja, On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 08:11:52PM +0200, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote: > Hi Ben, hi all, > > as you summoned an TSV AD... > > > Am 27.07.2018 um 17:24 schrieb Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu>: > > > > I should probably leave this to my (transport-area?) colleagues to discuss > > further, but I'm not sure that the interaction of this mechanism with > > high-RTT connections is fully covered -- for example, the inactivity > > timeout in Section 6.4(.x) could behave poorly when the timeout is set to a > > smaller value than the RTT, as the server would potentially end up starting > > the "forcibly abort" process (and potentially causing the client to lose > > for an hour) because the server's timer starts when it sends the DSO > > response that initiates its idea of the session, and would not recieve > > graceful shutdown messages from a properly-behaving client in time. > > My understanding is that they require a minimum time-out of 5 second at the > server side, which seems reasonably safe to me. However, maybe this could be > further clarified or explained in the doc.
I'm happy to defer to your expertise -- thanks! -Benjamin _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
