Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Many thanks to the authors for making what I expected to be a dry terminology document into an adventure of discovery. I agree with Mirja's assessment about whether this really updates 2308. I also agree with Alvaro's wish to rethink the BCP status (including his disinclination to stand in the way of publication this far into the process.) ยง2" - Definition of "Domain Name": I don't profess to be a naming expert, but this definition doesn't seem very satisfying. It potentially defines things that I wouldn't consider domain names. Is there no representation, intent, or other context that distinguishes an ordered list of labels that is a domain name from your garden variety ordered lists of labels? (or is the point of this that they cannot be distinguished?) - Definition of IDN: 'The current standard, normally called "IDNA2008"...' That may not age well. I suggest something to the effect of "The current standard at the time of this writing, ..." _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
