Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Alissa's Discuss points (and in particular would think that this document would be fine as Proposed Standard). One other comment, in Section 3.1: Why is the new text only placing a "SHOULD be registered" requirement, as opposed to MUST? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
