On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:06 AM Normen Kowalewski <nbkowalew...@gmx.net>
wrote:
> Dear Ladislav, Petr,
>
> Thank you for starting this work and the draft.
>
> We expect that creating and support of respective YANG models can allow to
> foster automation and interoperability in the field of DNS, and we desire to
> have more of both.
>
> Best regards
>
> Normen B. Kowalewski
> Deutsche Telekom AG
>
> Hi,
>
> we would like to present draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00. A
> 10-minute slot should be sufficient.
>
> Thanks, Lada
>
> In entries like:
enum NSAP-PTR {
value "23";
description
"Domain name pointer, NSAP style.";
reference
"- RFC 1348: DNS NSAP RRs
- RFC 1637: DNS NSAP Resource Records
- RFC 1706: DNS NSAP Resource Records";
}
It seems odd to me to create the reference field as a string that contains
what looks like YAML, except that it has extra blank lines. Does YANG not
have a standard way to represent a list, and should the reference field
always be a list, for consistency?
Also, the "template" and "registration date" fields appear to be missing.
--
Bob Harold
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
