On 11/3/2018 4:55 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
I'm also somewhat confused by the quoting in:
"In the case of the "SRV" "RR" and "URI" "RR", distinguishing among
different types" (and in "defining "RR"s that might" ) - I'm not sure
if it is intentional, but it doesn't align with much of the rest of the
formatting, and is (IMO) confusing around the first part.)
I used spanx too liberally, because it looked nice in the html version
on my machine, and I didn't realize what it did for the text version. My
use matched what I'm seeing in some bibxml entries, but you are right
that it doesn't look right in some of the sequences here.
So I've removed most spanx occurrences in the source.
Also nit (I think):
Adam Roach, Petr Špaček, Ondřej Sury
This is a dilemma. The characters produce appropriate text in html, to
show his actual name. The xml2rfc text rendering engine produces this
silliness and I'm inclined to class it as a bug in the engine.
If there is an established practice for working around that bug, to
produce the proper characters in html and an 'acceptable' alternative in
text, please let me know and I'll fix it.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
