On 2018-11-05 06:10 -0500, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 11/2/18 10:41 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
Speaking as a co-author of ANAME, I agree about this. URI, SRV, a proposed
new HTTP RRtype, whatever - service lookup is absolutely the correct way to
accomplish this goal.
However, browser vendors are *not doing that*, and I've given up hope that
they ever will. Trying to out-stubborn them has been ineffective.
Yes, but I can understand that they're not too inclined - I believe it's
not easy to portably get information about such RRTYPEs from the OS
resolver, e.g. I can't see a way in POSIX.
It seems there is a clear movement from many browsers to use DOH now for
DNS matters.
At which point they are able to get all DNS data in its full glory
without any kind of OS or underlying libraries limitations, and hence
could use SRV records like any other clients are doing for other protocols.
--
Patrick Mevzek
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
