On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 10:35 AM Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> wrote: > > We (as developers in our office) all have had gut feeling that NS is > mandatory but we could not find it in the RFCs. > > > I hate to say it, but we should really make sure that this is actually > stated somewhere where it can reasonably be found. If it is not, we > should state it. Petr was completely sensible to think it was the case > but not be sure. Saying that it is the case, and why it is the case, > would be helpful. This is something that I hadn’t really thought through > before Petr asked the question, but I’d been wondering about it too because > the question comes up in the DNSSD Discovery Proxy code I’m working on (I > assumed the answer was yes). >
If we write it down, perhaps we should also mention that other things that answer DNS queries, like load balancers, should also return proper SOA and NS records, not just A and AAAA records, for the same reasons. -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
