On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:53 AM Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola= 40open-xchange....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > > > Il 22 marzo 2019 alle 4.40 Christian Huitema <huit...@huitema.net> ha > scritto: > > > > Much of the debate is on the second point. One position is that users > should be forced to trust the DNS resolver provided by the local > infrastructure. Another position is that users have the right to apply > their own policy and decide which server they will trust, based on some > configuration. > > I think this is a mischaracterization of the debate, which actually > started because of a third position that you don't mention: Mozilla's > public statement that in the future they will force (or, at least, make as > a default - clarification requests haven't solved the doubt yet) Firefox > users to use a remote resolver chosen within a shortlist that they will > manage. > I'm not sure where you have attempted to clarify this point (I think we've been clear on this point at https://hacks.mozilla.org/2018/05/a-cartoon-intro-to-dns-over-https/) Regardless of what the default is, users will be able to disable DoH. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
