On 6/11/19 5:53 AM, Bob Harold wrote: > > If the camel was not already overloaded, then a cautious approach might > be to put it in the additional section, *unless* there was a capability > signal in the request that indicated that the requester would understand > ANAME, or at least not have a problem if it were in the answer section. > I am guessing that the capability signal would be some EDNS option, or > perhaps an EDNS version. Is that reasonable?
An EDNS capabililty signal would allow the ANAME to be sent in the answer bare, no accompanying A/AAAA needed. In absence of that signal, the authoritative *could* return the ANAME in the additional, but not sure if there would be much value to it, assuming the signal was standard behaviour. -- Michael Sheldon Dev-DNS Services GoDaddy.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
