In article <6bb18d2f-4701-41cf-9b50-9ee8541ed...@dukhovni.org> you write: >> On Nov 14, 2019, at 1:50 PM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: >> >> PS: I'm also coming to the conclusion that if you think DNAME solves >> your problem, and your problem isn't the arcane IPv6 rDNS renumbering >> for which it was invented, you don't understand DNAME. > >As you may recall, > > http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/adrEUoWPq1EoxonkvcCJCnEkcFg > >the .tw registry employs a DNAME to identify their traditional and simplified >Chinese IDN TLDs (simplified is a DNAME alias for traditional). ...
I know. I'm wondering how many of those DNAME'd names actually work. Remember that it's invalid for an NS or MX to point to a CNAME so I assume it's equally invalid for them to point to a DNAME. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
