Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> writes: > > I think our simplest and most appealing option would be to treat EDE > > exactly like any existing EDNS Option (i.e. set the TC bit). > > For the record, I'm just fine with this. People that *want* a separate > signal should speak up please and voice their reasons why having just > the TC bit is unacceptable too. > > We need to come to a decision about this, and that will require everyone > with an opinion to chime in.
Actually, I forgot that one of the primary reasons for separating it was that EDE can go forward and the need for TC/DP bits can be debated longer if need be. So... anyone that thinks something like the DP bit is needed *and* should be tied to EDE should speak up. Please. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
