On 1/9/20 6:37 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:21 AM, Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+i...@nic.cz > <mailto:vladimir.cunat+i...@nic.cz>> wrote: >> Depends what you'd want from the stamps. > If the stamps make assertions about what service is offered, I’d want > that to be verifiable. [...]
I'd personally have stamps without these assertions (or without giving them any weight). I see a bigger problem that some of desired assertions are in principle unverifiable, e.g. "no logging". Of course, we could (optionally) extend the string by a signature, but I suspect that'd increase the length a lot without sufficient gain in exchange.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
