Thanks for the review, Ines.

Barry

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:02 AM Ines Robles via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2020-02-28
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-02-28
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary:
>
> The document is well written,  it supplies appendixes with examples.
>
> This document describes a method for the operator of a recursive resolver
> to
> have a complete root zone locally, and to hide queries for the root zone
> from
> outsiders, at the cost of adding some operational fragility for the
> operator.
>
> I have some minor questions.
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues: None.
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> 1- Appendix B.5: it seems that the link is not valid: <https://knot-
>    resolver.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modules.html#root-on-loopback-rfc-
>    7706>
>
>   This link worked for me:
>   https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modules-rfc7706.html.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1- It seems that this document replaces RFC7706, but the document states
> that
> it updates RFC7706, is that correct?
>
> 2- Abstract: "The cost of adding some operational fragility for the
> operator",
> Does it introduce security considerations that have to be mentioned?
>
> 3- Section 1: "Research shows that the vast majority of queries going to
> the
> root are for names that do not exist in the
>    root zone." - Do you have some references to that research that can be
> added
>    to the draft?
>
> 4- I would expand KSK to Key signing key (KSK).
>
> 5- Should this draft add a reference to rfc8499?
>
> Thank you for this document,
>
> Ines.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to