On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 9:23 AM Robert Wilton via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> > My lack of domain knowledge made this document hard for me to understand, > but > given that this document as aimed at folks deploying DNS servers I don't > really > see that as a problem. > Thank you for your review Robert. One note is that the draft does use quite a few acronyms and has no > terminology > section. I'm not suggesting adding a terminology section but perhaps in > the > introduction it would be worth adding a sentence to point readers to RFC > 8499/BCP 219? This should probably also be listed as an informative > dependency > (assuming that the terms used are formally defined elsewhere). > That's a good suggestion. We can certainly mention RF8499. Another thing that might be helpful is to go through the doc and, where it makes sense, expand some of the acronyms/abbreviations on first use. Shumon Huque
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
