Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> writes: > Following up on Petr's suggestion that the "DNSEC Transparency" mechanism is > documented > and somewhat tested.
FYI, the new version (-04) that I just published hopefully clarifies better why this draft is useful with or without DNSEC Transparency. DNSSEC Transparency would certainly be helpful for auditing purposes. But protection is provided to validating resolvers even without it. And yes, DNSSEC Transparency probably needs our draft in order to reach scalability. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
