>> this is the draft where that issue would be decided, so it's >> good we're talking about it. ... > > by the way, this is what kato and i, and later jabley, were > trying to get at with > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize/ > > but it was like moving mud with a toothpick, so after eleven > years (2003 to 2014) we gave it up. there are probably some > good ideas in there, even now.
I've read it, and most of it makes perfect sense to me (I think I have one paragraph I'd like to discuss). When you say it was like "moving mud with a toothpick", was there any active opposition to the draft, or was it just a lack of engagement? Regards, - Håvard _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
