Hello dnsop, please find below revision -01 of this document.
Matt Nordhoff noticed that I upgraded the NSEC TTL requirements from 'SHOULD' to 'MUST' compared to the original texts, and pointed out that incremental signers might have a hard time honouring that 'MUST'. Matthijs Mekking (ISC/BIND) confirmed this theory. So, -01 drops the requirement level back to SHOULD, just like the original texts. I believe the document is ready for publication. Chairs, can we do a WGLC? On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 23:59 -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. > > Title : NSEC(3) TTLs and NSEC Aggressive Use > Author : Peter van Dijk > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2021-01-24 > > Abstract: > Due to a combination of unfortunate wording in earlier documents, > aggressive use of NSEC(3) records may deny names far beyond the > intended lifetime of a denial. This document changes the definition > of the NSEC(3) TTL to correct that situation. This document updates > RFC 4034, RFC 4035, and RFC 5155. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
