This should not be happening. You are abusing the code point allocation. The record format is supposed to be FIXED when the code point is allocated. I complained before the code point was allocated that it was not the right time in the development process to perform the allocation. When the code point is allocated the DNS record should be stable. That is both WIRE and PRESENTATION formats. Remember master file format is a INTERCHANGE specification.
The DNS has a reserved range for private types which are fine for experimentation. Mark > On 27 Feb 2021, at 07:13, Benjamin M. Schwartz <notificati...@github.com> > wrote: > > See #298 and tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni#391 > > You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: > > https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/299 > > Commit Summary > > • s/echconfig/ech/ > File Changes > > • M draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https.md (60) > Patch Links: > > • https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/299.patch > • https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/299.diff > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
