On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 08:58 +0200, Petr Špaček wrote: > On 08. 04. 21 16:39, Ben Schwartz wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback, Petr. I think the easiest solution is to relax > > the requirement language. I've proposed a change here: > > https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/313 > > <https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/313> > > Copying the diff here: > > > - Recursive resolvers SHOULD treat the SvcParams portion of the SVCB RR > > - as opaque and SHOULD NOT try to alter their behavior based > > - on its contents. > > > > + Recursive resolvers MAY treat the SvcParams portion of the SVCB RR > > + as opaque. No part of this specification requires recursive resolvers > > + to alter their behavior based on its contents, even if the contents are > > + invalid. > > This addresses my concern, thank you!
+1, thanks! Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
