On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 00:42, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > > On May 9, 2021, at 19:27, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > > > If I'm wrong about this being as good as it can be, there must be an item > > delimiter that is better than a comma. I am not thinking creatively enough > > to figure out what might be better than a comma. I'd be happy to hear > > proposals for a better item delimiter. > > I am quite behind on this topic, but I presume there's a reason to put all > these key-value pairs in a list in one RR? > > If we compare the two fictional RRTypes EG1 and EG2 illustrated below: > > example.com. EG1 key1=value1,key2=value2,... > > example.com. EG2 key1 value1 > example.com. EG2 key2 value2 > > It seems to me that EG2 avoids the need for delimiters at all. There's a bit > of overhead resulting from the need for a larger RRSet but it's not obvious > that that's a problem.
The current draft can reach the finishing line without tearing it to pieces. >8 > > Perhaps this horse has already sailed but I thought I'd mention it. Perhaps this horse needs to be tested for banned substances! --Dick _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
